‘2018’ is a film that captivates viewers with its compelling story, exceptional camera work, and extraordinary background score. Directed by Jude Anthany Joseph, the movie explores the struggles faced by individuals during the devastating Kerala floods of 2018. While the film boasts several strengths, including its well-crafted characterizations and engaging narration, there are also areas that could have been further developed. This article delves into the plus points and minus points of ‘2018’, highlighting its remarkable aspects alongside the missed opportunities.
Plus Points:
Terrific Camera Work and Extraordinary Background Score: ‘2018’ shines with its remarkable cinematography and skillful use of camera angles. The visuals beautifully capture the essence of the story, enhancing the viewers’ immersion in the film. The cinematography creates a tense atmosphere, particularly in the second half, keeping the audience on the edge of their seats. The extraordinary background score further elevates the emotional impact, effectively complementing the narrative and intensifying the viewing experience.
Well-Crafted Characterizations and Emotional Depth:
Director Jude Anthany Joseph demonstrates his strength in character development, crafting engaging personas that resonate with the audience. The characters’ motives and growth gradually unfold, deepening the emotional connection between the viewers and the on-screen events. Tovino Thomas delivers a standout performance, portraying a character who undergoes a remarkable transformation, from a man crippled by the fear of death to a courageous individual who defies the odds. Lal’s portrayal as Mathachan, a fisherman taking significant steps to save lives, also leaves a lasting impression.
Heartwarming Storyline and Narration:
‘2018’ presents a touching storyline that tugs at the heartstrings. Director Jude Anthany Joseph skillfully narrates the tale, engaging viewers from start to finish. The film explores the themes of survival, resilience, and compassion, effectively conveying the indomitable spirit of the people of Kerala in the face of adversity. The emotional depth of the storytelling keeps audiences invested in the characters’ journeys and their struggles to overcome the devastating floods.
Minus Points:
Limited Portrayal of Government and Media:
One of the shortcomings of ‘2018’ is its minimal exploration of the role played by the government and the media during the Kerala floods. While the focus on promoting humanity is commendable, a more comprehensive portrayal of these crucial entities would have added depth and provided a more holistic view of the crisis. Highlighting their efforts and contributions could have enriched the narrative and provided a broader context for the events depicted.
Underutilization of Aparna Balamurali:
Aparna Balamurali, a talented actress, has limited screen presence in ‘2018’, which may disappoint her fans. The director missed an opportunity to capitalize on her potential by not providing substantial scenes for her character. Including more significant moments for her would have allowed her to contribute more prominently to the overall plot, enhancing the film’s impact.
Confusion in the First Half:
The film’s first half may leave some viewers perplexed as the focus primarily revolves around the characters and their individual issues rather than the main plot. This narrative choice can lead to a sense of dissatisfaction and confusion among certain audience members. Additionally, the inclusion of certain characters with minimal impact on the plot may contribute to the overall confusion.
Missed Opportunities for Suspense:
‘2018’ could have benefitted from creating more suspense by showcasing additional scenes related to the impending threat and damage to the dam. Incorporating such moments would have heightened anticipation and added further intensity to the narrative, enhancing the overall viewing experience.
Conclusion:
‘2018’ stands out as a gripping tale of resilience, emotional depth, and the indomitable human spirit. The film’s exceptional camera work, extraordinary background score, and well-crafted characterizations contribute to its overall impact. While the limited portrayal of the government and media, underutilization of certain actors, confusion in the first half, and missed opportunities for suspense are notable drawbacks, they do not overshadow the film’s ability to engage and move the audience. ‘2018’ remains a heartfelt cinematic experience that underscores the strength of the human spirit in times of adversity.
